Registered User
Quote:
Cars were built better back then because they didn't have to compress all the fancy electronics, creature comforts, and marginally useful features into the car like they do now. Can anybody seriously imagine the operating costs of a tech-heavy car like the GTR in 10-15 years? Or any of the turbo'd BMW's that are already seeing problems? I don't even want to think about it.Originally Posted by bluedevils95
I have to agree w/ tg1234 on this one. Cars were built a lot better 10 yrs ago. Just imagine if there was no imports and it was all the classics that was still around. Pure mussels car built like tanks.
As long as cars keep going the route of more and more extravagant features, and consumers/government keep demanding increased performance with a decreased environmental footprint, they are going to last shorter amounts of time. Cars these days aren't built to last, they are built to please the consumer now, at the expense of long term reliability.
Registered User
When cars start to look like Back to the Future 2, i am going to buy one. I am pretty sure that's where the future is going to lead
Registered User
If you really want to talk about tank-like construction, consider my 1986 Mercedes 300SL. The engineering team within Mercedes back then actually nicknamed the car Der Panzerwagen ('the tank') because of it's solid build. It combines precision engineering with hand craftsmanship and nothing built today compares with, certainly not the new Mercedes.
That said, I'm lovin' the G. I actually had test driven the Lexus IS250 and found it a very nice car indeed until I test drove the G, which can tow the IS down the road faster than it can go under its own power. I didn't used to be a power freak, but now I'm drunk with......well, you know!
That said, I'm lovin' the G. I actually had test driven the Lexus IS250 and found it a very nice car indeed until I test drove the G, which can tow the IS down the road faster than it can go under its own power. I didn't used to be a power freak, but now I'm drunk with......well, you know!
Registered User
yes you will be hard pressed to find better build cars then pre about 98 Mercedes. You really used to get what you paid for, those things keep going forever.
about about the comment of no imports, uh that sounds horrible...
about about the comment of no imports, uh that sounds horrible...
Registered User
I give mine a 6. Too many problems, still has some. But love the way it looks and perform!
Registered User
Quote:
http://www.jdpower.com/autos/ratings...tings-by-brand
Also the G37 was rated higher on residuall value than any other competitor.
The problem I see is people lurking around forums and they see some posts few or maybe one member having problem with this or that. Than they jump to a conclusion and go saying this car has huge problems. Making assumption from few posts.
Originally Posted by tg1234
Here is JD power's list. That speeks for itself.http://www.jdpower.com/autos/ratings...tings-by-brand
Also the G37 was rated higher on residuall value than any other competitor.
The problem I see is people lurking around forums and they see some posts few or maybe one member having problem with this or that. Than they jump to a conclusion and go saying this car has huge problems. Making assumption from few posts.
Quote:
Mechanically actually the Infniti is one of the best. Let me see if I find it.
A lot of people driving other makes, accept costly mechanical problems over having small issues like an interior rattle. Priorities are *** backwards. But then again the 3rd generation G (G37 sedan) I would say is a solid 8-10 on everything.Originally Posted by tg1234
My 07 and 08 I gave solid 9.Mechanically actually the Infniti is one of the best. Let me see if I find it.
Registered User
From what I read the interior rattles on the GS 350 have been bad. Pulling off the whole dash and then the problem isn't fixed or comes back. That was one reason I didn't go for a GS. Wasn't many other reasons but that and price was.