03-04 airbox vs 06 airbox
#46
I just checked the DA it was between 1000 and 1500ft that's almost like running at CS. The track elevation is 167ft. the temp was 77 with 57% humidity. I have to wait until the temp is in the 60's for it to be below 500ft. Hopefully next month I'll do this test again the way you described when it's alot cooler.
#48
Originally Posted by Dsskyline
I just checked the DA it was between 1000 and 1500ft that's almost like running at CS. The track elevation is 167ft. the temp was 77 with 57% humidity. I have to wait until the temp is in the 60's for it to be below 500ft. Hopefully next month I'll do this test again the way you described when it's alot cooler.
Considering the usual temps, the 2 times I've been there its been atleast 3300 DA's
PS. Humidity doesn't play a huge factor in DA's compared to temps, elevation, & pressure.
.
#49
The Z's ET was slower because his 60 foot was a bit worse. That alone would account for a .3 seconds, however, he has about a 150lb weight advantage so some of that would be negated on the far end. The weight also explains why his trap was a bit better. His ET might be suffering because his exhaust may have killed most of his 1st gear. Your 3.5 gear is also hurting your MPH. I've run 24" DRs that made my car's effective ratio a 3.55 and my ETs were marginally worse, but my trap speed was 2mph slower because of the shift into 4th. My car went from 97.5mph to 95.5mph. Same day tested at the strip. That shift into 4th really kills MPH.
A 1,000-1,500 DA really isn't that bad. It's only impacting ET by about .15 seconds a MPH by 1mph.
It looks like the airbox may have improved power. It definitely looks like it didn't hurt anything. I will be ordering mine soon.
A 1,000-1,500 DA really isn't that bad. It's only impacting ET by about .15 seconds a MPH by 1mph.
It looks like the airbox may have improved power. It definitely looks like it didn't hurt anything. I will be ordering mine soon.
#52
Originally Posted by OCG35
wow that humidity suX!
How are you calculating the DA? Everything I find requires dew point and altimeter
How are you calculating the DA? Everything I find requires dew point and altimeter
#53
Originally Posted by Skaterbasist
The DA's at CS are hardly ever at 1000-1500
Considering the usual temps, the 2 times I've been there its been atleast 3300 DA's
PS. Humidity doesn't play a huge factor in DA's compared to temps, elevation, & pressure.
.
Considering the usual temps, the 2 times I've been there its been atleast 3300 DA's
PS. Humidity doesn't play a huge factor in DA's compared to temps, elevation, & pressure.
.
I was talking more the 1500 for CS which could happen when it's cold out. We always went when it was warm or hot.
#54
Originally Posted by DaveB
The Z's ET was slower because his 60 foot was a bit worse. That alone would account for a .3 seconds, however, he has about a 150lb weight advantage so some of that would be negated on the far end. The weight also explains why his trap was a bit better. His ET might be suffering because his exhaust may have killed most of his 1st gear. Your 3.5 gear is also hurting your MPH. I've run 24" DRs that made my car's effective ratio a 3.55 and my ETs were marginally worse, but my trap speed was 2mph slower because of the shift into 4th. My car went from 97.5mph to 95.5mph. Same day tested at the strip. That shift into 4th really kills MPH.
A 1,000-1,500 DA really isn't that bad. It's only impacting ET by about .15 seconds a MPH by 1mph.
It looks like the airbox may have improved power. It definitely looks like it didn't hurt anything. I will be ordering mine soon.
A 1,000-1,500 DA really isn't that bad. It's only impacting ET by about .15 seconds a MPH by 1mph.
It looks like the airbox may have improved power. It definitely looks like it didn't hurt anything. I will be ordering mine soon.
We got into a debate about the airbox. He told me if I wanted more power to take off my airbox and put on a cone filter. I told him wrong but he didn't believe me.
The filter he had didn't even have a heat shield it was home made so it was sucking in nothing but hot air. We are supposed to meet on sunday I'll take a picture of it.
#56
Originally Posted by DaveB
The Z's ET was slower because his 60 foot was a bit worse. That alone would account for a .3 seconds, however, he has about a 150lb weight advantage so some of that would be negated on the far end. The weight also explains why his trap was a bit better. His ET might be suffering because his exhaust may have killed most of his 1st gear. Your 3.5 gear is also hurting your MPH. I've run 24" DRs that made my car's effective ratio a 3.55 and my ETs were marginally worse, but my trap speed was 2mph slower because of the shift into 4th. My car went from 97.5mph to 95.5mph. Same day tested at the strip. That shift into 4th really kills MPH.
A 1,000-1,500 DA really isn't that bad. It's only impacting ET by about .15 seconds a MPH by 1mph.
It looks like the airbox may have improved power. It definitely looks like it didn't hurt anything. I will be ordering mine soon.
A 1,000-1,500 DA really isn't that bad. It's only impacting ET by about .15 seconds a MPH by 1mph.
It looks like the airbox may have improved power. It definitely looks like it didn't hurt anything. I will be ordering mine soon.
#57
#59
Originally Posted by OCG35
I'm not so sure your theory on shorter gears (in several threads) is altogether accurate... I ran 101+ last time out with 3.7 (fastest was only 99+ with 3.3)...