Intake & Exhaust Questions and info regarding various aftermatket exhaust systems for the G35 (Headers,Y-Pipes, and Cat-Back Systems)

Dynoing out the myth of Intake mods: The Results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average.
 
  #151  
Old 02-01-2012, 09:48 AM
JUST1NSANE's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Tupelo, MS
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I found this intake http://www.ebay.com/itm/STILLEN-HI-F...item27c2a7c0af and I believe it was the Stillen that Rob had tested and achieved the most HP on the dyno with. Is this it or does Stillen have another intake box model?
 
  #152  
Old 02-11-2012, 09:55 AM
JUST1NSANE's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Tupelo, MS
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just out of curiosity Rob, did you notice the car ever running lean with the MREV2 lower and a spacer? I am currently thinking of ordering the Mrev2 lower and 5/16s spacer for my 06 rev up but I've heard it can be dangerous to my motor at higher RPMs without an ecu tune. Unfortunately, I only have money for the 2 mods and not a $699 Osiris tuner. Is there anything I can do to insure my reliability or correct it or is it safe to run those two mods with the stock MAF and ECU?
 

Last edited by JUST1NSANE; 02-11-2012 at 10:04 AM.
  #153  
Old 02-11-2012, 10:25 AM
carl576's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I have the MREV not the upper plenum. I was thinking of adding the upper plenum but am fearful of losing the midrange bite I get now. In terms of damaging the engine with the mrev at high rpm Ive never heard that so I am curious to hear replies
 
  #154  
Old 02-11-2012, 10:40 AM
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: OC - So Cal
Posts: 17,181
Received 154 Likes on 112 Posts
Originally Posted by JUST1NSANE
Just out of curiosity Rob, did you notice the car ever running lean with the MREV2 lower and a spacer? I am currently thinking of ordering the Mrev2 lower and 5/16s spacer for my 06 rev up but I've heard it can be dangerous to my motor at higher RPMs without an ecu tune. Unfortunately, I only have money for the 2 mods and not a $699 Osiris tuner. Is there anything I can do to insure my reliability or correct it or is it safe to run those two mods with the stock MAF and ECU?
Originally Posted by carl576
I have the MREV not the upper plenum. I was thinking of adding the upper plenum but am fearful of losing the midrange bite I get now. In terms of damaging the engine with the mrev at high rpm Ive never heard that so I am curious to hear replies
these plenum mods are not going to run your engine lean enough to do damage - and very doubtful that you will even notice it running lean... when people mention being lean they determined that from a/f ratio during dyno...

If you hear your engine pinging/knocking (thin rapid metallic ticking is the best way I can describe it), you are lean - but that only happen in high rpm and once you now the sound you will instinctively let of the gas. No damage will result unless you lay heavy on the accelerator in those high rmp while it's pinging, which unless you are on a race track you will never do anyway.

In any event - MREV2 and or plenum spacer will not lean you out enough for that concern - and may not lean you out at all (the ecu can adapt to minor changes in A/F).

Other mods, such as test pipes or hfc can lean you to the point that you will notice performance loss - in which case A/F need to be adjusted via tune (such as Osiris). But again, with plenum mods this wont be an issue.
 
  #155  
Old 02-11-2012, 11:30 AM
sexyrob's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 3,947
Received 136 Likes on 62 Posts
I know with all bolt ons I was running pretty lean. 15s at low rpm to high 13 at the top. I highly suggest a tune after bolt ons I gained 20 HP on top of my mods just with a good tune plus tons of mid range power. Car felt completely different and tons more fun!
 
  #156  
Old 02-11-2012, 08:25 PM
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: OC - So Cal
Posts: 17,181
Received 154 Likes on 112 Posts
^^^ when you say "bolt-ons" you must be referring to more than plenum mods - and more than just intake (even if it includes plenum)... if not, its likely you were lean to begin with (it happens).

As for 20 hp gains - that isnt uncommon with intake (including plenum) and full exhaust with a tune. However, gains may be seen with a tune even without full breather mods (not 20 hp, but gains over stock). Not enough to warrant getting a tune without breather mods - but I'm putting the big picture into perspective so no one misinterprets what is being said.
 
  #157  
Old 04-14-2012, 05:41 PM
Jairen's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Bremerton, Wa
Posts: 3,544
Received 149 Likes on 113 Posts
Visiting thread again to see the re-read the results. Looks like the link isn't working.
 
  #158  
Old 04-14-2012, 11:11 PM
sexyrob's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 3,947
Received 136 Likes on 62 Posts
I tested it again, seems to work for me.
 
  #159  
Old 04-17-2012, 01:52 PM
bosszio's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When testing stock Intakes with K&N and OEM Filters was the resonator (bottom of intake where filter sits) left on or did you have that removed. Not sure if that tiny thing would even make a difference but just curious.
 
  #160  
Old 04-17-2012, 01:58 PM
sexyrob's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 3,947
Received 136 Likes on 62 Posts
it was left in to replicate OEM conditions.
 
  #161  
Old 04-17-2012, 02:04 PM
bluedevils95's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 19,624
Received 575 Likes on 502 Posts
Good to know. Never saw this before. Getting a tune in the summer time.
 
  #162  
Old 04-17-2012, 06:52 PM
JaE35's Avatar
Moderator

iTrader: (37)
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 8,318
Received 802 Likes on 678 Posts
G35 Sedan
LOL just clear everything out and update the first post with this

 
  #163  
Old 04-19-2012, 11:52 AM
v1nc86's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I just read your thread... Wow nice write up man!
 
  #164  
Old 04-19-2012, 01:07 PM
garfield's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 140
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Nice write up! It was clear
I will definitely use this!
 
  #165  
Old 04-20-2012, 01:03 PM
sexyrob's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 3,947
Received 136 Likes on 62 Posts
one more thing to add as of last weekend. I was at a local dyno day and there was a guy who was NA and recently purchased the kinetix manifold. I convinced him to let me try it on my newly boosted engine. I did dyno's back to back to back same strapping to compare my modified manifold with spacer to the kinetix that claims like 30hp.. it didn't make anymore power and actually the power curve came in later, basically shifted to the right. He also didn't make any power with it, he showed a gain of about 8hp but he still had a stock plenum (revup) no spacer. I told him a spacer and mrev2 manifold would likely net more power. So that was disappointing but not surprising. it's shiny but thats about it!

 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: Dynoing out the myth of Intake mods: The Results



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:32 AM.