OFFICIAL: Aggressive Wheel fitment FLUSH/STRETCH sedan

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 7 votes, 5.00 average.
 
Old Jul 19, 2010 | 11:18 PM
  #1186  
G35xChicago's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 39
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by STCLAIRWEST
Thanks guys.....This thread was my motivation
Love those wheels on your car!
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2010 | 11:41 PM
  #1187  
Gthang85's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by CandlestickPark
I have no idea what your ride height and camber settings are but you can fit a 9.5 +35 up front with no prob, but not with a 245/40, the tire is too large. It will fit with a 245/35. If you ran that size out back though it would be too tucked.

Any reason why you aren't going to stagger the wheels?
Its my DD, so i would like to rotate them. So run the 245/35 out back also? I would love to run stagger but tires dont come cheap with a lowered car lol.
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2010 | 11:44 PM
  #1188  
FlyingLumpia's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,284
Likes: 39
From: Washington State
Originally Posted by CandlestickPark
I have no idea what your ride height and camber settings are but you can fit a 9.5 +35 up front with no prob, but not with a 245/40, the tire is too large. It will fit with a 245/35. If you ran that size out back though it would be too tucked.

Any reason why you aren't going to stagger the wheels?
I ran a 19x9.5 somewhere +30-+38 with a 275/35, I did have to have my camber arm all the way neg.

Here is the pic

 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2010 | 11:49 PM
  #1189  
CandlestickPark's Avatar
ill Sedan
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (87)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 23,261
Likes: 2,688
From: Long Beach, SoCal
Premier Member

^Ernie are you saying you ran a 275/35 up front or out back. I believe it would work out back with a lot of camber but because he's trying to run the same width up front the front will be more stretched than the rear.
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2010 | 11:49 PM
  #1190  
Matzo Ball's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (22)
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,163
Likes: 113
From: St. Louis, MO
Originally Posted by FlyingLumpia
I ran a 19x9.5 somewhere +30-+38 with a 275/35, I did have to have my camber arm all the way neg.

Here is the pic

mmmmm, Challenges. Love that set up on the DP.
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2010 | 11:58 PM
  #1191  
FlyingLumpia's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,284
Likes: 39
From: Washington State
They are gts, Yes the fronts were 275/35. There were on my buddies r34. I was thinking about getting them. (I should have he was going to sell them to me for 1100). But we were wondering how it would fit. It did. Like I said I am was not sure what the offset was, but i think it was in the range I posted.
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 12:01 AM
  #1192  
FlyingLumpia's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,284
Likes: 39
From: Washington State
Originally Posted by Gthang85
Its my DD, so i would like to rotate them. So run the 245/35 out back also? I would love to run stagger but tires dont come cheap with a lowered car lol.
I would say run a 235/35 and 265/30. There are a few no big name companies that have those size and run cheaper than 245/40 or 245/35.
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 12:23 AM
  #1193  
Gthang85's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Thanks guys a lot. Just looked at the tires an found some great prices. So im gonna stagger the tires like fly said.
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 12:24 AM
  #1194  
Gthang85's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Might go 19s, but the wheels i want only come in 18s lol.
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 09:25 AM
  #1195  
Matzo Ball's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (22)
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,163
Likes: 113
From: St. Louis, MO
Originally Posted by FlyingLumpia
They are gts, Yes the fronts were 275/35. There were on my buddies r34. I was thinking about getting them. (I should have he was going to sell them to me for 1100). But we were wondering how it would fit. It did. Like I said I am was not sure what the offset was, but i think it was in the range I posted.
Doet!!!! Though the VS-XXs are quite purty.
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 01:55 PM
  #1196  
geesteezd's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,148
Likes: 13
From: Temecula, CA
theyre not vs-xx either haha
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 02:02 PM
  #1197  
jlo0109's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 0
From: ::626::714::818::
Any 2nd Gen love??
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 02:34 PM
  #1198  
G SEDAN's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (94)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 17,055
Likes: 19
From: Southern California
^ wrong forum section
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 02:43 PM
  #1199  
CandlestickPark's Avatar
ill Sedan
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (87)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 23,261
Likes: 2,688
From: Long Beach, SoCal
Premier Member

^and you can count them on one hand I believe. Hopefully we'll see more aggressive 2nd Gen Sedans in the future. It wasn't that long ago when there were hardly any 1st Gens with aggressive fitment.
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 03:38 PM
  #1200  
STCLAIRWEST's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 24
From: TORONTO
Aggressive fitment FTW
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 7 votes, 5.00 average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:30 AM.