Tuned at Uprev this morning 2006 5AT coupe - Page 3 - G35Driver

Sep 7, 2009 | 04:25 PM

#31

j_marinelli

Registered User

iTrader: (10)

Joined: Jan 2009

Posts: 389

Likes: 0

From: San Antonio, TX.

Quote:

Originally Posted by GT-ER

Wait...fuel economy mode makes the AF ratio 13.25? That's richer than stock, how is that saving you fuel? Unless you meant 15.25?

I am not a pro on it I am just going by what the paper they printed out for me says. It could be a typo though

Sep 8, 2009 | 12:45 PM

#32

Sentientbydesig

Registered User

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Dec 2008

Posts: 70

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tollboothwilley

You don't have 17:1 AFR's. Except maybe at idle.

The ECU parameters for the G35 don't allow it to lean out that much. I don't know where you are coming up with that number but its not accurate.

Let's not insult my intelligence any further, K?

The 17:1 AFR was taken off a dyno run at Church Automotive. They did the AFR as a courtesy (because I waited for 3 hours for a Stillen Intake to be installed on a G37) so I don't have the AFR plot to post up.

Oct 2, 2009 | 12:04 AM

#33

2K6G35c

Registered User

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Apr 2003

Posts: 848

Likes: 7

From: Big D

Quote:

Originally Posted by ColinsCoupe

I suggest putting in new NGK Iridium LFR7AIX-11.

Sorry to intrude but, how much of a difference would that make? My car has 27K, so would those plugs help at all? I plan to go down to Austin for a tune, as soon as I have FI cats installed in about a month. Thanks.

Oct 2, 2009 | 08:42 AM

#34

GT-ER

Registered User

iTrader: (10)

Joined: Dec 2008

Posts: 1,901

Likes: 2

From: Puerto Rico

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sentientbydesig

It still doesn't mean it's accurate. I've never seen a car go to 17 at wot without blowout...it'll simply misfire so bad that it won't accelerate.

Oct 4, 2009 | 11:20 PM

#35

Tollboothwilley

Former G35driver Vendor

iTrader: (32)

Joined: Jan 2008

Posts: 3,684

Likes: 28

From: Vegas

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sentientbydesig

I'm not insulting anything. I'm just telling you that the ECU parameters don't allow for that to happen.

Just because church's wideband showed 17's doesn't mean its accurate.

Aug 8, 2011 | 07:30 PM

#36

Algy

Registered User

iTrader: (8)

Joined: Jun 2006

Posts: 1,281

Likes: 79

This thread is old.. but does anyone know why the numbers are low?

Aug 9, 2011 | 09:11 AM

#37

DailyDrivenCoupe

Registered User

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Nov 2009

Posts: 1,566

Likes: 28

From: South Carolina

not bad numbers but definately seen better before. at least its running properly now!!

Oct 12, 2011 | 03:33 AM

#38

jinc1026

Registered User

Joined: Nov 2010

Posts: 118

Likes: 3

From: Fullerton, CA

only +6hp... im thinking about getting a tune too

but .... worth it?

Oct 12, 2011 | 10:17 AM

#39

ratm68

Registered User

iTrader: (11)

Joined: Feb 2005

Posts: 3,111

Likes: 224

From: Clarksville, MD

is it me or does the tune seem kinda rich? I always thought 13 was the 'target' AF on NA. Most dyno with gains, shows the tune AF to be flat-lining at 13 throughout the powerband.