My morning at Eibach .

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #16  
Old 02-06-2007, 06:14 PM
Canadian144's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice, looks great!
 
  #17  
Old 02-06-2007, 06:16 PM
kewltea's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm jealous...
 
  #18  
Old 02-06-2007, 06:18 PM
Canadian144's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Too bad you can't drop the X, not that theres any reason to up here in Canada.. .. You would just get stuck in the snow! Thats why ours has the original ugly 17's on it.. however when I get the car when I'm 17, I'm gettin some 19's or 20's for the summer.... and I've already started saving for them lol
 
  #19  
Old 02-06-2007, 06:54 PM
SPEEED's Avatar
Bad Toro
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 12,576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IMO I think it's a tad too low for the stock wheels/tires.

It would be interesting to see that badboy with some new shoes.
 
  #20  
Old 02-06-2007, 06:58 PM
kewltea's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by acidrane
call me crazy but id rather raise the rear a bit to match the front, not the other way around. i ahd a pretty low car for 3 yrs and not having to worry about scraping or busting up the front bumper cuz of the parking block is a real plus to me atm. id want top lower it but not that low. just enough to hav less wheel gap.

vick
Coming from a lowered car, I still take bumps and dips really slowly even though I don't have to now
 
  #21  
Old 02-06-2007, 07:31 PM
kring's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Looks good, definitely better then stock, however It does look a tad bit too low, I would raise it up a tiny bit, the front looks much better then the back because the wheel is inside the wheel well on the back after lowering and that disrupts the cleanliness of the car. raising the back is the way to go, front looks spot on.

Is that going to be the only size they make? I've thought about this but if that's lowering it 31/33mm, I would like it at 20/20mm around the whole car.
 
  #22  
Old 02-06-2007, 07:49 PM
robinchen's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: so cal heights
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
looks excellent. like others have stated, i think it would look better if u raised the back up a little tad more to even it out. and then your good to go btw where did u get the springs from? online?
 
  #23  
Old 02-06-2007, 07:52 PM
terrycs's Avatar
Registered User

Thread Starter
iTrader: (54)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,519
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by robinchen
looks excellent. like others have stated, i think it would look better if u raised the back up a little tad more to even it out. and then your good to go btw where did u get the springs from? online?
I was at Eibach ... they gave me the springs as part of R&D.
 

Last edited by terrycs; 02-09-2007 at 01:43 AM.
  #24  
Old 02-06-2007, 07:54 PM
terrycs's Avatar
Registered User

Thread Starter
iTrader: (54)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,519
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by kring
Looks good, definitely better then stock, however It does look a tad bit too low, I would raise it up a tiny bit, the front looks much better then the back because the wheel is inside the wheel well on the back after lowering and that disrupts the cleanliness of the car. raising the back is the way to go, front looks spot on.

Is that going to be the only size they make? I've thought about this but if that's lowering it 31/33mm, I would like it at 20/20mm around the whole car.
True the back is lower, but I think the amount is slightly distorted by the angle the pictures were taken at. If there is a way for me to post the high resolution picture in front of the fence, you can see the rear tire actually meets the fender prefectly without tucking under.
 
  #25  
Old 02-06-2007, 07:54 PM
hokiesean24's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 3,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the rear looks a little low, I would bump it up to match the front too. I think its a little too much drop if its beginning to tuck the stock 18s into the fender well a touch... That of course is just my opinion.

Is that more or less drop than I should expect from the H&R Kit? If its going to be that much/more, I may have to check it out with the wheels before lowering it.
 
  #26  
Old 02-06-2007, 08:04 PM
kewltea's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by terrycs
I was at Eibach ... they gave me the springs.

Just curious, how early did you contact them about the springs? Did you have to let them to R&D w/ your car?
 
  #27  
Old 02-06-2007, 10:01 PM
808MIKE's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Posts: 952
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Thumbs up

DAMN!! That Looks Sweet! Same color as Mine, Can't wait till they come out with the productuon version of these Springs! Thank's for the Pics Terrycs
 
  #28  
Old 02-06-2007, 10:10 PM
Nismo G's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 7,244
Received 23 Likes on 13 Posts
looks great man! It actually looks amazing!

-sean
 
  #29  
Old 02-06-2007, 10:22 PM
Railgunner's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SC
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hokiesean24
I think the rear looks a little low, I would bump it up to match the front too. I think its a little too much drop if its beginning to tuck the stock 18s into the fender well a touch... That of course is just my opinion.

Is that more or less drop than I should expect from the H&R Kit? If its going to be that much/more, I may have to check it out with the wheels before lowering it.
H&R lists their springs as lowering 1.3" front and 1.2" rear.

Terrycs says the springs he got lowers 31mm (1.22") front and 33mm (1.3") rear.

So the H&R springs should be a touch lower in the front and not quite as low in the rear.

I'll have the H&R springs on mine Thursday. I'm predicting I'll rub like a bitch on the back without some major neg. camber with my +40 rear offsets but my 40+ rears will be hear on the 15th so I can live with it like that for a few weeks.
 

Last edited by Railgunner; 02-06-2007 at 10:29 PM.
  #30  
Old 02-06-2007, 11:21 PM
terrycs's Avatar
Registered User

Thread Starter
iTrader: (54)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,519
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
OK, I thoght I would post up some cropped and zoomed pics of the back for those interested.

Like a couple of you, I'm kinda wondering if raising the back up a little so the fender gap matches the front would be good because then I may not need to go with a camber kit. But then again, If I got the camber kit, would the gap then match the front? And also, how much of an effect does the full tank of gas contribute? Feel free to comment!





 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: My morning at Eibach .



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:00 PM.