05 G35C vs another new 05 or 06 mustang GT
#92
Again Facts Rule
06 g35 0-60 6.2 sec.Not bad for a luxury car.I don't know how luxurious it can be for 30,000.My Mustang stickered at 34,900.For you math guys .1 sec at 95 mph is 14 feet or about one car lenght. 14.3 vs 13.5 in the 1/4 The MUSTANG WINS BY MORE THAN 10 car lengths. I use to own a 2004 lincoln ls with a v8 ($44,000)awesome ride beuteiful car and pretty quick in it's own right but I would never claim to have beaten a Mustang in it.Facts Rule look at the Data.http://www.dragtimes.com/Infiniti-G3...slip-8069.html http://www.autos.com/autos/car/luxur...se/performance
#93
Originally Posted by AMZNBLUE
06 g35 0-60 6.2 sec.Not bad for a luxury car.I don't know how luxurious it can be for 30,000.My Mustang stickered at 34,900.For you math guys .1 sec at 95 mph is 14 feet or about one car lenght. 14.3 vs 13.5 in the 1/4 The MUSTANG WINS BY MORE THAN 10 car lengths. I use to own a 2004 lincoln ls with a v8 ($44,000)awesome ride beuteiful car and pretty quick in it's own right but I would never claim to have beaten a Mustang in it.Facts Rule look at the Data.http://www.dragtimes.com/Infiniti-G3...slip-8069.html http://www.autos.com/autos/car/luxur...se/performance
I asked the other guy and I'll ask you: have *you* ever taken *your* car to the track? Do you have any idea how fast *you* are in *your* car? Until you do, then you have no real-world experience on which to compare your cars to others.
Apparently you have selective comprehension skills. I have personally beaten a mustang gt at the track. So has my wife. That doesn't mean that we'll beat every mustang gt.
#95
You have to compare Apples to Apples both cars being STOCK and both cars being driven by PRO DRIVERS.There are no comparisons between these 2 STOCK cars.Yes Iv'e been to the track My 06 is running high 12's With SCT tune C&L CAI 4.10 gears and flowmaster exhaust.To be honest with you and this is not intended to be a flame but your average joe with a g35 won't even bring it to a track.(unless he's had some work done to it).You can take pretty much any car in the world throw a bunch of money at it for mods and get some amazing times.But thats not what were talking about.Were talking about a level playing field 1.Stock cars 2.Same track conditions elevation etc 3. Same driver The g35 STOCK will lose everytime.
#96
Example Take a look at your Mods.05 6MT Sedan. k&n, ztube, mrev, crawford cats, stillen gen1 catback
Kazera KZ-A 18x8.5, wrapped in 245/40/18 Kumho ECSTA ASX all seasons; 13.791@102.22 With all those modifications your getting some pretty good times.13.791 but a stock 06 mustang Gt runs at 13.5 with two expierenced drivers like yourself you would lose by almost 3 car lengths even with all your mods.I'm not saying you can't beat a Mustang but if YOU personally drove both cars your going to get better times in the Stang.
Kazera KZ-A 18x8.5, wrapped in 245/40/18 Kumho ECSTA ASX all seasons; 13.791@102.22 With all those modifications your getting some pretty good times.13.791 but a stock 06 mustang Gt runs at 13.5 with two expierenced drivers like yourself you would lose by almost 3 car lengths even with all your mods.I'm not saying you can't beat a Mustang but if YOU personally drove both cars your going to get better times in the Stang.
#97
Originally Posted by AMZNBLUE
06 g35 0-60 6.2 sec.Not bad for a luxury car.I don't know how luxurious it can be for 30,000.My Mustang stickered at 34,900.For you math guys .1 sec at 95 mph is 14 feet or about one car lenght. 14.3 vs 13.5 in the 1/4 The MUSTANG WINS BY MORE THAN 10 car lengths. I use to own a 2004 lincoln ls with a v8 ($44,000)awesome ride beuteiful car and pretty quick in it's own right but I would never claim to have beaten a Mustang in it.Facts Rule look at the Data.http://www.dragtimes.com/Infiniti-G3...slip-8069.html http://www.autos.com/autos/car/luxur...se/performance
Wow they saw you coming a mile away.
![Big Grin](https://g35driver.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#98
Originally Posted by AMZNBLUE
You have to compare Apples to Apples both cars being STOCK and both cars being driven by PRO DRIVERS.There are no comparisons between these 2 STOCK cars.Yes Iv'e been to the track My 06 is running high 12's With SCT tune C&L CAI 4.10 gears and flowmaster exhaust.To be honest with you and this is not intended to be a flame but your average joe with a g35 won't even bring it to a track.(unless he's had some work done to it).You can take pretty much any car in the world throw a bunch of money at it for mods and get some amazing times.But thats not what were talking about.Were talking about a level playing field 1.Stock cars 2.Same track conditions elevation etc 3. Same driver The g35 STOCK will lose everytime.
Unfortunately, I don't have video proof to back up my times(though I do have timeslips, and have posted a link). However, another guy(Mario77746) does: he ran a 13.9@100 in his 6mt sedan, with a "no name" intake. Refer to this thread: https://g35driver.com/forums/g35-sedan-v35-2003-06/87682-13-99-100-4mph-today.html.
And if you want the video, look here: http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...7445583098.htm
If you pay attention at the end, not only did the g35 beat the gt by roughly 1 full second, he also out trapped him by 4mph. And did you see how all that "torque" of the gt helped the launch???
Dude, I've provided the proof. If choose not to believe it, then I guess you also believe the earth is flat and the moon landing was staged. As for your high 12's. Nice times. There's no way I'm ever going to his high 12s without a *lot* more work.
#99
Originally Posted by AMZNBLUE
Example Take a look at your Mods.05 6MT Sedan. k&n, ztube, mrev, crawford cats, stillen gen1 catback
Kazera KZ-A 18x8.5, wrapped in 245/40/18 Kumho ECSTA ASX all seasons; 13.791@102.22 With all those modifications your getting some pretty good times.13.791 but a stock 06 mustang Gt runs at 13.5 with two expierenced drivers like yourself you would lose by almost 3 car lengths even with all your mods.I'm not saying you can't beat a Mustang but if YOU personally drove both cars your going to get better times in the Stang.
Kazera KZ-A 18x8.5, wrapped in 245/40/18 Kumho ECSTA ASX all seasons; 13.791@102.22 With all those modifications your getting some pretty good times.13.791 but a stock 06 mustang Gt runs at 13.5 with two expierenced drivers like yourself you would lose by almost 3 car lengths even with all your mods.I'm not saying you can't beat a Mustang but if YOU personally drove both cars your going to get better times in the Stang.
But I agree with you on the 05+ GT. I probably would get better times in the mustang, once I learned how to cope with the torque advantage.
On that note, my best friend's wife just bought an 06 5 speed gt. It's her first manual tranny car as a daily driver, and her first ever rwd car, and by far the most powerful car she's ever driven. She got it specifically to beat her husband(owns a stock srt4). It will be a while before she's comfortable enough to race it, and even longer before she gets any good(I've improved noticebly in the past year myself). But I am anxious to see what times she'll put down.
#101
First off RealGone a 2006 Mustang Gt Conv.Premium can sticker for over 35,000.Mine was a little less because I didn't go with the side impact air bags and shaker 1000 stereo upgrade.I work for Ford and used my A plan Company discount to knock it down by about 4,000 so I didn't pay that.TREY if you spent a year with a stock g35 and a stock Mustang Gt and took them to the track you would probably be a full second faster in the 1/4 mile in the GT.That is all I'm saying is that the Mustang is the faster of the two cars.However your g35 would blow my car away if my wife were driving it.
#102
Originally Posted by AMZNBLUE
First off RealGone a 2006 Mustang Gt Conv.Premium can sticker for over 35,000.Mine was a little less because I didn't go with the side impact air bags and shaker 1000 stereo upgrade.I work for Ford and used my A plan Company discount to knock it down by about 4,000 so I didn't pay that.TREY if you spent a year with a stock g35 and a stock Mustang Gt and took them to the track you would probably be a full second faster in the 1/4 mile in the GT.That is all I'm saying is that the Mustang is the faster of the two cars.However your g35 would blow my car away if my wife were driving it.
#103
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Skyline_G35
I know you probably don't care, but I just got the utmost respect for ya. Go race that tool bag. ![Big Grin](https://g35driver.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Big Grin](https://g35driver.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Cool](https://g35driver.com/forums/images/smilies/cool.gif)
Last edited by 2FastG354U; 07-10-2006 at 04:50 PM.
#104
No offense Trey but I haven't seen any stock times in a g35 run 14 flat.I'm not saying that you couldn't I just can't find anything that suggests different.Here is a link these were the best times I could find for the stock g35 14.73 vs 13.5 Thats even more than a second.Any pics of your car?I'll leave a couple of mine. http://autos.msn.com/research/vip/sp...niti&model=G35 http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e3...e/100_0551.jpg http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e3...e/100_0556.jpg http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e3...e/100_0555.jpg