Drivetrain Questions and info regarding transmissions, clutches, etc.

RPM's at 80 MPH

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #226  
Old 12-29-2009, 12:48 AM
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 0
Received 72 Likes on 51 Posts
[QUOTE=Tollboothwilley;4776494]I think part of the reason you get such bad gas mileage is because California gas SUCKS NUTS.QUOTE]

I could see that.
 
  #227  
Old 12-29-2009, 12:51 AM
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew

iTrader: (24)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Posts: 37,810
Received 583 Likes on 496 Posts
I know Cali get the sucky 91 octane but I don't see that hurting mpg. But if they use ethanol all year, THAT would suck. Most areas only add it during the winter.
 
  #228  
Old 12-29-2009, 01:43 AM
Tollboothwilley's Avatar
Former G35driver Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (32)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vegas
Posts: 3,684
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 17 Posts
Its not the 91 Octane that is the problem...its the damn ethanol. At least 10% in Cali. Plus there are tons of hills...up and down up and down all the time. Its fun to drive, but sucks the gas like its a slurpee on a summer day in Phoenix.

We only have 91 octane here...and only 91 in AZ.
 
  #229  
Old 12-29-2009, 02:09 AM
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: OC - So Cal
Posts: 17,181
Received 154 Likes on 112 Posts
no hills to speak of where I drive (coastal So Cal - LA/OC area)
 
  #230  
Old 12-29-2009, 11:24 AM
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 0
Received 72 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
I know Cali get the sucky 91 octane but I don't see that hurting mpg. But if they use ethanol all year, THAT would suck. Most areas only add it during the winter.
I live in Kansas therefore my fuel is 10% ethanol, but luckily, I can get 93 octane now. Every since they did the ethanol switch across all fuel grades, my MPGs slipped about 10% (17-18 100% city, 24-25 100% highway). I just don't see how ethanol is a viable fuel source.
 
  #231  
Old 12-29-2009, 11:52 AM
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew

iTrader: (24)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Posts: 37,810
Received 583 Likes on 496 Posts
Ethanol actually raises the octane. But it's lower BTU makes it less efficent, hence the lower mpg. But it burns cleaner so they use it in the winter to help reduce emissions.
 
  #232  
Old 12-29-2009, 06:26 PM
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew

iTrader: (24)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Posts: 37,810
Received 583 Likes on 496 Posts
So with the FD change, the speedometer is now going to be incorrect? Anyway to re-correct this? Cable driven speedos can get a different gear but I'm sure the z/g don't use cable driven speedo anymore.
 
  #233  
Old 12-29-2009, 06:41 PM
NFSP G35's Avatar
? = 2B || !2B

iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tallahassee, FL (or thereabout)
Posts: 22,160
Received 851 Likes on 639 Posts
^ Not if your tires are the same overall diameter as stock. Speedometer goes off rear wss
 
  #234  
Old 12-30-2009, 01:41 AM
Tollboothwilley's Avatar
Former G35driver Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (32)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vegas
Posts: 3,684
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
So with the FD change, the speedometer is now going to be incorrect? Anyway to re-correct this? Cable driven speedos can get a different gear but I'm sure the z/g don't use cable driven speedo anymore.
The speedo comes off of the sensor reading axle stub teeth. Changing the FD doesn't change MPH reading at all as long as you change the whole pumpkin. If you tried to reuse axle stubs you would probably have issues.
 
  #235  
Old 12-30-2009, 01:44 AM
Tollboothwilley's Avatar
Former G35driver Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (32)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vegas
Posts: 3,684
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
Ethanol actually raises the octane. But it's lower BTU makes it less efficent, hence the lower mpg. But it burns cleaner so they use it in the winter to help reduce emissions.

I'm sure they compensate for the ethanol when they do octane ratings as well...(thin out the quality of the gas because you are raising the octane via ethanol). Its not that you are getting a octane increase from the ethanol 90% 91 octane + ethanol (98 octane - guess) and getting an overall 92 ish.

I'm sure its a double damn.
 
  #236  
Old 12-30-2009, 03:38 PM
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: OC - So Cal
Posts: 17,181
Received 154 Likes on 112 Posts
Originally Posted by Tollboothwilley
The speedo comes off of the sensor reading axle stub teeth. Changing the FD doesn't change MPH reading at all as long as you change the whole pumpkin. If you tried to reuse axle stubs you would probably have issues.
no issues here with speedo (original pumpkin with different fd)
 
  #237  
Old 12-31-2009, 12:06 AM
Tollboothwilley's Avatar
Former G35driver Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (32)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vegas
Posts: 3,684
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 17 Posts
right, you didnt change pumpkins/stub axles. If you had changed pumpkins but not stub axles you would have problems from what I understand.
 
  #238  
Old 12-31-2009, 12:40 AM
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 0
Received 72 Likes on 51 Posts
Well, you guys have convinced me to do the 3.5/vlsd swap. I hope my CC works like Toll's too, even though my G will no longer be the long distance family hauler after March when we get rid of the wife's 98 Legacy GT wagon and get a newer, far more plush late model Outback Limited. I'll admit, I have argued in the past that the 3.5 swap doesn't make much difference in the 1/4 mile as tested with my 23.5" tall drag radials (makes the effective ratio a 3.55). My car was fractionally slower ET wise and about 1.5mph slower due to the early 4th gear shift. But the 3.5 gear WITH the 23.5 DRs would bring the ratio up to a 3.75. After doing some math and factoring in the extended rev limiter of the TS ECU flash, the car could be a bit quicker in the 1/4 (possibly .2 seconds). The real benefit should be in auto-x which is what I'm more focused on now as well as nice daily driving throttle response.
 
  #239  
Old 12-31-2009, 12:47 AM
Tollboothwilley's Avatar
Former G35driver Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (32)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vegas
Posts: 3,684
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 17 Posts
Driveability is changed significantly. You'll love the difference across the whole power band. With increased rev -limit & transgo kit I bet you would lose .3-.4 sec in the 1/4.

i'm running 245/35/19 which are about 2% shorter than stock...effectively puts me around 3.6 FD ratio.
 
  #240  
Old 12-31-2009, 07:57 AM
Blue Dream's Avatar
I drove ttrank's car solo

iTrader: (50)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: By the sea, Tx
Posts: 18,299
Received 1,486 Likes on 1,221 Posts
G35 sedan w/ too much money in mods
Originally Posted by Tollboothwilley
Driveability is changed significantly. You'll love the difference across the whole power band.
I agree as well. I wasn't expecting a phenomenal difference, but have been pleasantly surprised with the difference. I see the biggest change between 3-6000 RPMs as the car just takes off. Freeway ramps are really fun, and Dave, I think you'd see a big benefit for your Auto-X.

After 2 tanks of gas and a lot of spirited driving on a combination of freeway and city miles, my gas mileage is w/in .5 MPG (18.5) of my normal average. I have had no issues with the CC either, but I haven't tried to set it above 85.

Overall a really good bang for the buck mod if you can get a good price. I'm just curious to ride in a 3.7 swap and see if that is where I should have gone in the first place. I know OCG35 really likes his.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: RPM's at 80 MPH



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:14 PM.