What do you hate about YOUR G35?
#1396
Yes that is what I am saying. Oh and it has 20 years of technology since 1990. But still if you take a 1990 348 GTS and look at the price tag it is going to be around $40,000.00. On top of that you have to pay for the $300 oil change every 2k to 3k, then you also need to have the car re-tuned every 5k to 10k. So yes the G is a fast, luxurious, and handles good. Think of that at 20 years ago for over $100,000.00. now we can pick up a car with the same numbers as a Ferrari. I remember when 0-60 in 5.5 seconds was crazy fast. I guess I am just old or something.
#1398
its not 20 years, g35s came out in late 2002 so thats 12-13 years after 1990.
although honda had a 3.0 DOHC V6 with 270hp back in 1990(which later became a 3.2 making 290hp). the acura legend with the type 2 motor had 230hp so a DOHC 3.5 that makes 260-280hp isn't exactly ground breaking.
on the other hand powerwise it kicked the IS300's *** and the TL/CL is fwd. it was a performance bargain compared to other entry level luxury cars...sort of falls between the 330 and the m3
although honda had a 3.0 DOHC V6 with 270hp back in 1990(which later became a 3.2 making 290hp). the acura legend with the type 2 motor had 230hp so a DOHC 3.5 that makes 260-280hp isn't exactly ground breaking.
on the other hand powerwise it kicked the IS300's *** and the TL/CL is fwd. it was a performance bargain compared to other entry level luxury cars...sort of falls between the 330 and the m3
Last edited by Hammerhead i-Eagle Thrust; 05-17-2010 at 10:41 AM.
#1399
My G35 is a 2004, so it IS 14 years in my case.
So a new G is fast, luxurious and handles good compared to a 20 year old Ferrari? Technology has come a long way. It's not even the same league. You can pick up the same numbers as a 20 year old car, way to go
Yes that is what I am saying. Oh and it has 20 years of technology since 1990. But still if you take a 1990 348 GTS and look at the price tag it is going to be around $40,000.00. On top of that you have to pay for the $300 oil change every 2k to 3k, then you also need to have the car re-tuned every 5k to 10k. So yes the G is a fast, luxurious, and handles good. Think of that at 20 years ago for over $100,000.00. now we can pick up a car with the same numbers as a Ferrari. I remember when 0-60 in 5.5 seconds was crazy fast. I guess I am just old or something.
![Biggthumpup](https://g35driver.com/forums/images/smilies/biggthumpup.gif)
#1400
its not 20 years, g35s came out in late 2002 so thats 12-13 years after 1990.
although honda had a 3.0 DOHC V6 with 270hp back in 1990(which later became a 3.2 making 290hp). the acura legend with the type 2 motor had 230hp so a DOHC 3.5 that makes 260-280hp isn't exactly ground breaking.
although honda had a 3.0 DOHC V6 with 270hp back in 1990(which later became a 3.2 making 290hp). the acura legend with the type 2 motor had 230hp so a DOHC 3.5 that makes 260-280hp isn't exactly ground breaking.
Oh and the Acura CL Type-S with the 3.2 liter v-6, 0-60 is 6.8 sec. Then the 3.5 liter TL did 0-60 in 6 seconds. None of these cars hit the marks that the G hit.
#1402
It is a fvcking Ferrari, I don't care if it is 28 years old. 0-60 in 5 sec was unheard of back then. In 20 years do you think we will have Ferrari's getting to 60 in 1 second? I doubt it.
#1404
#1405
Comon dude, 0mph to 60mph in 5.1-5.5 sec. That is fast as hell in most standards. Back in 1990 we would own supercars.
The 1990 Ferrari 348 GTS = Zero to sixty was achieved in only 5.5 seconds, with the top sped of 165 mph. This thing had a V8, and it is a Ferrari, the numbers look a lot like the G35 numbers. G35 not fast, ha.
The 1990 Ferrari 348 GTS = Zero to sixty was achieved in only 5.5 seconds, with the top sped of 165 mph. This thing had a V8, and it is a Ferrari, the numbers look a lot like the G35 numbers. G35 not fast, ha.
Edmunds tested the G35 coupe auto & got 6.2 & 14.66 .
MotorTrend has it @ 5.8
Car and Driver hast it @ 6.0 & 14.6
Last edited by jibberjabbers; 05-17-2010 at 02:51 PM.
#1406
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://g35driver.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
#1407
20 years from now. I was a huge honda guy back then. I don't think the 3.0 could get the car to 60 in under 6 seconds. Actually in 1990 when they came out with the 3.0 liter v6 it only had 160 hp and 162 ft lbs. the 0-60 time was a little over 9 seconds. There has never been a car that has close to supercar stats for the price you can get a G or Z for. There is just no comparison. I Love my honda's. The engine is put together 100% better than almost any other out there. Hell I had a 86 Honda Accord 2 door hatchback Lx-i model with the 2.0 liter Programmed Fuel injection engine and that baby would fly, I out ran an eighties model BMW M3 in that little accord, on the interstate with speedo buried at 130mph and I was still picking up speed while the M3 was topped out at about 120mph.
Oh and the Acura CL Type-S with the 3.2 liter v-6, 0-60 is 6.8 sec. Then the 3.5 liter TL did 0-60 in 6 seconds. None of these cars hit the marks that the G hit.
Oh and the Acura CL Type-S with the 3.2 liter v-6, 0-60 is 6.8 sec. Then the 3.5 liter TL did 0-60 in 6 seconds. None of these cars hit the marks that the G hit.
if you want to talk auto vs auto
#1409
geez you guys are fanboys....i didn't buy my car from straight line speed and I certainly wouldn't buy a TL/CL/Accord for that reason, but the topic of power was being discussed..why you gotta be such a douche about it, sorry for telling the truth about your car
and how exactly is saying that g35 have comparable acceleration to CLs and TL being a honda fanboy, i could say the same thing about maximas and 3.5 altimas being as fast or faster then g35s
and how exactly is saying that g35 have comparable acceleration to CLs and TL being a honda fanboy, i could say the same thing about maximas and 3.5 altimas being as fast or faster then g35s