Hotchkis Sway Bars

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 02:51 PM
  #226  
InTgr8r's Avatar
Staff ALUMNI (retired)
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (23)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 21,095
Likes: 47
From: Toronto, GTA north
Originally Posted by san~man
I wonder if they have a high enough spring rate to work effectively with the stiffer sways?
1st gen cars the sedan sport, coupe & 350Z were all the same rate, just different drops.
I'm planning to check rates on 2nd gens.
It won't be right away though, especially with 370Zs just hitting the street.
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 02:53 PM
  #227  
mishmosh's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 73
From: NE Ohio
Personally, I would definitely get sways first. They are cheaper and easier to install. Springs actually cost quite a bit when you consider install time, camber kit, alignment, premature shock wear, etc.

If I had an X and no one made F/R sets, I think it would definitely be worthwhile just to get the rears. But I think it probably is best to wait it out and hopefully someone will step up. How come someone can't send their bars in and have Hotchkis make a prototype off that and send both back to the user for fitting?
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 03:03 PM
  #228  
InTgr8r's Avatar
Staff ALUMNI (retired)
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (23)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 21,095
Likes: 47
From: Toronto, GTA north
Originally Posted by mishmosh
................
If I had an X and no one made F/R sets, I think it would definitely be worthwhile just to get the rears. But I think it probably is best to wait it out and hopefully someone will step up. How come someone can't send their bars in and have Hotchkis make a prototype off that and send both back to the user for fitting?
Rear only might be your only choice for the X
I'm not positive but I thing 1st gen X are still waiting.

I think it boils down to demand.
Outside of G35Driver, not many G35X drivers will be looking for sways.
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 03:39 PM
  #229  
E-Ticket Ride's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,568
Likes: 55
Update on driving impressions:

From the limited amount of time I've driven today on the total CRAP roads in my area, I can say without a doubt that the ride is quite a bit more bumpy than with the stock bars. If you're expecting the same "plush" and "absorbant" ride from the stock suspension after these bars are installed, you're in for a rude awakening. The difference in ride quality is understandable if you look at how the sway bars interact with the lower control arms via the end links: the suspension arms move up/down, relaying the travel to the end links and eventually to the sway bars. Since the sway bars have less bend and play to them due to the beefier design, more of the road inconsistency is now placed on the springs/shocks than before. The fact that the original springs/shocks are designed for a more "luxury" or "GT" type of ride becomes evident, and how the spring rates are low and the shocks are too compliant.

It isn't like it isn't bearable, but there is a noticable difference. Just beware when you install them that you will want new springs/shocks in the future (at least I do).
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 03:41 PM
  #230  
Csquared's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,890
Likes: 1
From: Madison, WI
Hmm So would it be possible for someone to contact Hotchkis and see if they would sell just the rears? How would the performance be with just rear sways? I mean I guess the rear won't roll as much but the front would still right? I don't have a spare Sway i can send in for hotchkis to do a prototype. I need to drive my car hahaha.
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 03:57 PM
  #231  
E-Ticket Ride's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,568
Likes: 55
H&R's on the Stillen site are sold seperately, but they're quite pricey.
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 03:58 PM
  #232  
E-Ticket Ride's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,568
Likes: 55
I need some coilovers now.....
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 04:03 PM
  #233  
Csquared's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,890
Likes: 1
From: Madison, WI
On the site it says for the H&R sways :H&R SWAY BAR REAR 03-09 350Z INCL ROADSTER / 03-08 G35 INCL. SEDAN ADJUSTABLE 23MM

so according to them it fits the first gen sedans too? So the 1st gen Sways would fit our 2nd gen cars?!
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 04:06 PM
  #234  
E-Ticket Ride's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,568
Likes: 55
I'm not sure, I just saw that this morning so I posted it. I would say to call them, and if it fits, to find out what the adjustibility range is.
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 04:16 PM
  #235  
InTgr8r's Avatar
Staff ALUMNI (retired)
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (23)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 21,095
Likes: 47
From: Toronto, GTA north
Originally Posted by san~man
Update on driving impressions:

From the limited amount of time I've driven today on the total CRAP roads in my area, I can say without a doubt that the ride is quite a bit more bumpy than with the stock bars. If you're expecting the same "plush" and "absorbant" ride from the stock suspension after these bars are installed, you're in for a rude awakening. The difference in ride quality is understandable if you look at how the sway bars interact with the lower control arms via the end links: the suspension arms move up/down, relaying the travel to the end links and eventually to the sway bars. Since the sway bars have less bend and play to them due to the beefier design, more of the road inconsistency is now placed on the springs/shocks than before. The fact that the original springs/shocks are designed for a more "luxury" or "GT" type of ride becomes evident, and how the spring rates are low and the shocks are too compliant.

It isn't like it isn't bearable, but there is a noticable difference. Just beware when you install them that you will want new springs/shocks in the future (at least I do).
What settings did you start out with?
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 04:19 PM
  #236  
E-Ticket Ride's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,568
Likes: 55
Originally Posted by InTgr8r
What settings did you start out with?
The first.
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 04:22 PM
  #237  
InTgr8r's Avatar
Staff ALUMNI (retired)
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (23)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 21,095
Likes: 47
From: Toronto, GTA north
Originally Posted by san~man
The first.
First being softest?

After you've had them for a while, it's interesting to change up the settings.
You can really change the understeer/oversteer characteristics.
Take baby steps though.
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 04:25 PM
  #238  
E-Ticket Ride's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,568
Likes: 55
Originally Posted by InTgr8r
First being softest?

After you've had them for a while, it's interesting to change up the settings.
You can really change the understeer/oversteer characteristics.
Take baby steps though.

Ya, outermost hole (softest).

I'm gonna drive around on the first hole about a week or so, then try the second hole. I'm fully expecting the ride to get worse the stiffer the rear is, but we'll see.

Man I miss my Bilsteins
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 05:07 PM
  #239  
CalsonicVQ's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
I didn't notice a big difference in bumpiness as san~man described, but I am already lowered on Eibach springs with 19" wheels so it was already bumpier than stock (compared to the 08 Journey loaner car w/OEM 17" wheels that I drove).
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 06:04 PM
  #240  
boss81's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 651
Likes: 1
From: Orlando, FL
Same here, I also have 19s and springs, so the ride seemed rougher because of those.
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:16 PM.