Wheels & Tires Grabbing the road and stopping.

Low offset stance VS regular stance debate

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #1  
Old 07-23-2009, 10:24 PM
V35_Gcoupe's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Low offset stance VS regular stance debate

I'm just gonna ask a simple question since it seems to be a very hot topic from the threads I've read and seen.



Why is it that guys who are into the stretched tires low offset pokage look can easily admit that their specific style isn't really meant for performance and taking corners at max speed, but the performance guys with meaty tires and tucked wheels can never man up and admit low offset stretch style looks better than theirs.



and I ask this question not to start a flame war, but because through all the threads I have read I've seen a lot of stretch guys admit it's mostly for looks, but I've never seen one performance guy admit that the style looks better than their meaty tires tucked in look.
 
  #2  
Old 07-23-2009, 10:48 PM
Shincrono's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 250
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
I like meat
 
  #3  
Old 07-23-2009, 11:05 PM
Mustang5L5's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Taxachusetts
Posts: 8,818
Received 468 Likes on 391 Posts
Originally Posted by V35_Gcoupe
I'm I've never seen one performance guy admit that the style looks better than their meaty tires tucked in look.

That's your opinion.

My opinion is the meaty tires look is much better that stretched.


I'm not into the whole VIP, stretched tires up in the fender with 30* of camber look at all. That is my opinion
 
  #4  
Old 07-23-2009, 11:21 PM
V35_Gcoupe's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mustang5L5
That's your opinion.

My opinion is the meaty tires look is much better that stretched.


I'm not into the whole VIP, stretched tires up in the fender with 30* of camber look at all. That is my opinion

we're not talking about stretched tires vs meaty tires buddy, we're talking the whole package..... here's a comparison of the 2 different styles I'm talking about.











VS







 
  #5  
Old 07-23-2009, 11:34 PM
redlude97's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by V35_Gcoupe
we're not talking about stretched tires vs meaty tires buddy, we're talking the whole package..... here's a comparison of the 2 different styles I'm talking about.
There is nothing to admit, you are talking about style, which is an opinion. Meatier tires perform better. That is a fact. See the difference?

BTW, aggressive FAT fitment FTW


 
  #6  
Old 07-23-2009, 11:34 PM
French87's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: San Jose
Posts: 2,007
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
simple answer to your question is because looks are an opinion, but reduced performance of running bigger wheels/negative camber/etc is a fact.

people with meaty tires will more than likely tell you they think it looks better than the alternative route, other wise they would have gone that other route.

your basicaly assuming that all the people with meaty tires have them for performance reasons but wish they could have the look of low offsets/stretch. your completely wrong, theres plenty of people with F/Id cars that are running stretched tires negative camber and low offsets even though it takes a bit away from the thousands they dropped in the engine, why? because thats their preference
 
  #7  
Old 07-23-2009, 11:35 PM
Jairen's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Bremerton, Wa
Posts: 3,544
Received 149 Likes on 113 Posts
I'm in between.

I do like the tuck but not a fan of -23 degrees (ex) of camber.

I like the rim to be flush with the fender with the tire slightly tucked in as posted in the last picture of the IP G.

I like the tire to have a USABLE contact patch. Not a fan of the people who use too much neg camber and so much stretch that equals up to a contact patch of a spare tire.

Also not a fan of the hot rod look on a G. Example is when people use too wide of a rim, wide tire and a tall sidewall in the rear almost resembling a drag car on tall racing slicks.

Just my opinion.
 
  #8  
Old 07-23-2009, 11:49 PM
heyitsalex's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
If you can't ft aggressive fitment, it's usually because you don't have the ***** to experiment with offsets, camber, and tires.

It comes down to how much ***** you have.
 
  #9  
Old 07-24-2009, 02:25 AM
BuckeyeInMI's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Northern Lower Michigan
Posts: 1,846
Received 34 Likes on 29 Posts
Or it's never about that. Maybe someone doesn't feel it's that important to get the most aggressive look possible. Some of us even think it looks kinda stupid. But that has nothing to do with the size of my sack. Some of us drive our cars year-round, including winter, and a super-aggressive setup would be ridiculously impractical.
 
  #10  
Old 07-24-2009, 02:37 AM
ttrank's Avatar
Grocery getter

iTrader: (57)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 27,305
Received 190 Likes on 60 Posts
Get what you like...

I like close to flush with some tire for better performance. Some go for the more aggressive look. To each their own. It's your $$$
 
  #11  
Old 07-24-2009, 03:14 AM
Skaterbasist's Avatar
Retired SuperMod
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Southern Cali --> 818
Posts: 13,068
Received 101 Likes on 66 Posts
Who says you can't have both? I have a lot of respect for guys that balance both of them out properly.

I like the low-offset look to a limit. As long as you can have a flush look, with moderate to little negative camber, and enough tire, you have a thumbs up from me

The reason you don't see this often is because its harder to execute then the other [the low-offsets & stretched tire or high-to-moderate offsets and meaty tires]
 
  #12  
Old 07-24-2009, 03:34 AM
HXS's Avatar
HXS
HXS is offline
Registered User
iTrader: (29)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,839
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by V35_Gcoupe
their specific style isn't really meant for performance and taking corners at max speed,
because it's true and a fact.

Originally Posted by V35_Gcoupe
but the performance guys with meaty tires and tucked wheels can never man up and admit low offset stretch style looks better than theirs.
because it's an opinion. most performance guys probably truly hate the stretch look. that's why they're performance guys it's not a matter of "manning up".
 
  #13  
Old 07-24-2009, 03:37 AM
Triple8Sol's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (151)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 7,288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry to say, this thread is pretty stupid. Looks are subjective. Performance is quantifiable.

Everyone has their own preference for what they run themselves on each of their cars, as well as what they do/don't like on other people's cars. In this case, it is possible for someone to like both, or even strike a balance with both.
 
  #14  
Old 07-24-2009, 10:54 AM
jzurita's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ummm...







 
  #15  
Old 07-24-2009, 11:26 AM
Mark_V35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
on a black rim, the tyre not stretched looks awesome. adds more dish
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Low offset stance VS regular stance debate



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:04 PM.