3rd party independant tear down results of a failed VQ motor.
Originally Posted by express705
julian, your attitute flat out sucks.
dont accuse me of selective reading. who do you think you are?
had you read my posts, you would understand what i mean.
amature reader too...
dont accuse me of selective reading. who do you think you are?
had you read my posts, you would understand what i mean.
amature reader too...

PS, this guy does not TUNE CARS. He takes his car to others to have it tuned and to install other parts. Does this guy even know how to turn a wrench?!
https://g35driver.com/forums/g-spot/...torsports.html
and
https://g35driver.com/forums/florida...ml#post3515842
Last edited by G35_TX; Oct 27, 2008 at 10:58 AM.
^ Step away from the computer and take a fap break.
Now back on topic... Per my350z:
Thanks r0mey for clarifying that the 3rd party report posted in this thread is for Vino's motor.
-Eric (still waits for GTM to respond to the 3rd party report on Vino's motor)
Now back on topic... Per my350z:
Originally Posted by r0mey
The engine report belongs to VINO.
My first motor failed and since that day even til today ive been stuck in the middle with no car that was some time back in may I believe. As all of you read I got another motor about a month ago so from may til a month ago the z sat with no motor and then that failed.
My engine will have a failure report soon. When it does I will post til then I just keep reading everyones thoughts and speculations
My first motor failed and since that day even til today ive been stuck in the middle with no car that was some time back in may I believe. As all of you read I got another motor about a month ago so from may til a month ago the z sat with no motor and then that failed.
My engine will have a failure report soon. When it does I will post til then I just keep reading everyones thoughts and speculations

-Eric (still waits for GTM to respond to the 3rd party report on Vino's motor)
Last edited by RudeG_v2.0; Oct 27, 2008 at 11:15 AM.
I'm not taking sides and will wait till the 3rd party inspection report comes out...
I consider both Sam and Julian friends but I don't appreciate Sam bringing me into this mess with the link you posted...
How is pointing out that Julian and I didn't see eye to eye at one point in time going to get Rome's car fixed...?
Every shop has had issues - most don't get posted because they get handled and worked out between the customer and shop... when things don't get resolved then everyone finds out, lesson to all going forward...
Good Luck Rome....
I consider both Sam and Julian friends but I don't appreciate Sam bringing me into this mess with the link you posted...
How is pointing out that Julian and I didn't see eye to eye at one point in time going to get Rome's car fixed...? Every shop has had issues - most don't get posted because they get handled and worked out between the customer and shop... when things don't get resolved then everyone finds out, lesson to all going forward...
Good Luck Rome....
Originally Posted by express705
what sound did this motor make?? a tick? vibrations?? descriptions?
(bang bang chitty chitty bang bang our fine four fendered frienddddddddd)
(bang bang chitty chitty bang bang our fine four fendered frienddddddddd)
PS I admittedly just took a FAP BREAK..Refreshed..
Last edited by Julian; Oct 27, 2008 at 03:15 PM.
Originally Posted by IIQuickSilverII
so from all that is posted.....not the only question i have but this is one
so basically your gtm stg1 cam failed (you havent admited its your fault yet or its even a possibility that there is a manufacturing error yet)... because rome, willingly (acording to how you make it sound) upgraded to gtm stg2 he had to pay for the cams?.....now you arent saying it, but are you implying that you hooked up rome in anyway for the stg2 cams?
How much are gtm stg1s? i imagine you at least gave him credit for the cost of them right?
IMO if you were to make things right he should have had to pay nothing for the stg2s...(for example if stg1 cost 1000 and stg2 1300 at max hed had to pay 300)
so basically your gtm stg1 cam failed (you havent admited its your fault yet or its even a possibility that there is a manufacturing error yet)... because rome, willingly (acording to how you make it sound) upgraded to gtm stg2 he had to pay for the cams?.....now you arent saying it, but are you implying that you hooked up rome in anyway for the stg2 cams?
How much are gtm stg1s? i imagine you at least gave him credit for the cost of them right?
IMO if you were to make things right he should have had to pay nothing for the stg2s...(for example if stg1 cost 1000 and stg2 1300 at max hed had to pay 300)
Originally Posted by urban
Julian any idea when this 3rd party report will be completed?
He has been calling there 10 times a day..We only were contacted once by the 3rd party.
Originally Posted by mforrest100
I do agree with this entirely. If Romey paid for a new set of Stage 2 cams, then he should have still received the replacement set of Stage 1 cams that he could probably sell to recover some money and he should receive the Stage 2 cams since he paid full price. Based on the numbers above....its like he paid $2300 for a set of Stage 2 cams. He should of had both cams since one should have been replaced under warranty.
Originally Posted by Julian
Ask Sam,
He has been calling there 10 times a day..We only were contacted once by the 3rd party.
He has been calling there 10 times a day..We only were contacted once by the 3rd party.
Originally Posted by Julian
Ask Sam,
He has been calling there 10 times a day..We only were contacted once by the 3rd party.
He has been calling there 10 times a day..We only were contacted once by the 3rd party.
Originally Posted by r0mey
This is what occurred I did end up paying for 2 sets of cams but only have 1 set that was working. I wish i had a complete stage 1 set to sell and recoup some money. Actually some time back I had my stage 1s up for sale but had to close the thread when I found out they were defective. I told sam that I wanted stage 2 which i had wanted for some time. I never knew that the stage 1s would be replaced free because honestly. Julian had a set of bc stage 2s to give me for free. But talking to sam he strongly urged/convinced me to go with his cams and him putting the motor all together out in california so there were no problems. I have my old cams but the defective ones not new replaced cams. Only good working cams i have are the new ones I paid for.
I must say, you are quite calm for someone who has been without his z for 6 months. I hope things work out for you.
This entire situation is confusing because of the way the information has been presented.
The engine report posted is Vino's motors inspection. This engine ran for an unspecified amount of time 4 quarts low on oil. I'm not an engine builder, but I do have a mechanical background and I know that when you run a high performance machine with almost no oil things heat up, change size, and rub. To what degree I don't know, but this HAS to be taken in to consideration when looking at the component measurements and pictures in the report that Julian has posted. Julian also hand picked the inspector on Vino's motor (assumption) so there "may" be some bias in that report. The inspector for Rome's motor was picked by Rome and is considered an unbiased third party by both GTM and MRC.
******************EDIT********************
Julian at MRC contests that the motor was run with no oil. He claims they added 4 quarts over time, and that at no time was the motor 4 quarts low. This directly condridicts GTM's claims.
******************EDIT********************
Although Julian posted the report on Vino's motor most of the conversation has been centered around Rome's car. There is NO 3rd party information available about Rome's car (yet). The reason why the 3rd party information about Rome's car is important is because Rome's car was NOT driven X amount of miles 4 quarts low on oil. The results of this inspection will have much more merit, as there are far fewer unknowns.
In Vino's case it is easy for GTM to point fingers, and honestly I can't blame them. If I'm an engine builder and I hear one of my motors has been ran without oil I would fight tooth and nail to not warranty it, as that is considered abuse/neglect. No engine builder has control of what the internals of a motor will do running 4 quarts low on oil. In fact, dealerships won't offer warranty on your stock motor if you take it in for repair and they find it has no oil! Now, if the motor is burning oil, that is a COMPLETELY different subject, but as the owner of a boosted car it is the owners responsibility to check and maintain oil levels. The burning oil issue should have been fixed by GTM BEFORE it was able to cause more substantial damage.
Romes 2nd GTM motor, on the other hand was never driven. It would be much harder for GTM to "wash their hands" of this motor. There is no way one could perceive that the motor was abused. It was never tuned and never street/track driven by MRC or the customer.
The oil squirter issue isn't confusing at all. There was an obvious mistake made in the assembly and GTM has offered to send replacement squirters (although, I too wonder about what will keep the piston from breaking the replacement squirter - are they a low profile design or something???)
I have been accused of being "biased" in my posts already and hope that my efforts to clearify these points is not seen that way. I haven't chosen sides, I've just summarized the information posted in an attempt to inform people what is what in this thread. I, like many others, have no horse in this race, and I stand to gain/lose nothing if either shop were to close their doors tomorrow. To the best of my knowledge these are "facts" documented in this thread (besides where noted as assumptions).
The engine report posted is Vino's motors inspection. This engine ran for an unspecified amount of time 4 quarts low on oil. I'm not an engine builder, but I do have a mechanical background and I know that when you run a high performance machine with almost no oil things heat up, change size, and rub. To what degree I don't know, but this HAS to be taken in to consideration when looking at the component measurements and pictures in the report that Julian has posted. Julian also hand picked the inspector on Vino's motor (assumption) so there "may" be some bias in that report. The inspector for Rome's motor was picked by Rome and is considered an unbiased third party by both GTM and MRC.
******************EDIT********************
Julian at MRC contests that the motor was run with no oil. He claims they added 4 quarts over time, and that at no time was the motor 4 quarts low. This directly condridicts GTM's claims.
******************EDIT********************
Although Julian posted the report on Vino's motor most of the conversation has been centered around Rome's car. There is NO 3rd party information available about Rome's car (yet). The reason why the 3rd party information about Rome's car is important is because Rome's car was NOT driven X amount of miles 4 quarts low on oil. The results of this inspection will have much more merit, as there are far fewer unknowns.
In Vino's case it is easy for GTM to point fingers, and honestly I can't blame them. If I'm an engine builder and I hear one of my motors has been ran without oil I would fight tooth and nail to not warranty it, as that is considered abuse/neglect. No engine builder has control of what the internals of a motor will do running 4 quarts low on oil. In fact, dealerships won't offer warranty on your stock motor if you take it in for repair and they find it has no oil! Now, if the motor is burning oil, that is a COMPLETELY different subject, but as the owner of a boosted car it is the owners responsibility to check and maintain oil levels. The burning oil issue should have been fixed by GTM BEFORE it was able to cause more substantial damage.
Romes 2nd GTM motor, on the other hand was never driven. It would be much harder for GTM to "wash their hands" of this motor. There is no way one could perceive that the motor was abused. It was never tuned and never street/track driven by MRC or the customer.
The oil squirter issue isn't confusing at all. There was an obvious mistake made in the assembly and GTM has offered to send replacement squirters (although, I too wonder about what will keep the piston from breaking the replacement squirter - are they a low profile design or something???)
I have been accused of being "biased" in my posts already and hope that my efforts to clearify these points is not seen that way. I haven't chosen sides, I've just summarized the information posted in an attempt to inform people what is what in this thread. I, like many others, have no horse in this race, and I stand to gain/lose nothing if either shop were to close their doors tomorrow. To the best of my knowledge these are "facts" documented in this thread (besides where noted as assumptions).
Last edited by KPierson; Oct 27, 2008 at 06:33 PM.



